v0.1 proposed the brand separation in concept. v0.2 reports what's been prototyped against that proposal — for review with the collective. Nothing here is collectively locked yet.
#58e1ff accent reserved for action / focus / interactive feedback. This is the proposal up for review; not yet a collective-agreed direction. See §06 below for full details and the rationale.#58e1ff). WallSpace remains full multicolor; the Gooism proposal is mono + this one cyan. Reads as related family, distinct identities./media/ on wallspace.studio. Same files referenced from gooism.org and inside this doc.All Q.01–Q.06 in §07 below are still open. Q.02 (migration option) has a concrete proposal up for collective discussion; the others are wide open.
Two brands have been quietly conflated. With Gooism's new logo system landing this week, it's time to separate them — before the collective grows further and the muddle becomes load-bearing.
GPortal currently uses #58e1ff cyan and #ff3cad pink as its primary palette. That palette belongs to WallSpace.Studio, the desktop app and platform inside Neem LLC. GPortal inherited it as a placeholder when we built the MVP — fast was more important than brand-correct.
What's changed: the new GOOISM wordmark and standalone G mark have arrived, and they're emphatically not cyan and pink. They're white-on-black neon — a sculptural, monochrome, retro-futurist identity that carries its own weight without needing color tricks. Gooism has its own brand now. WallSpace has its own brand. They've been wearing each other's clothes.
Both brands live under Neem LLC. They serve different surfaces. The clearer the split, the easier each becomes to scale.
This page itself is rendered in the new Gooism monochrome system on gooism.org. The remaining Gooism-adjacent docs still on wallspace.studio (gportal-spec, analogtoai-clipping, the Gooism index) are in WallSpace cyan-and-pink. That intentional contrast is the brand split made visible — each lives on the surface that fits its brand.
A wordmark for surfaces with breathing room. A standalone G for surfaces without it.
assets/web-portal/media/. SVG vector versions are still pending — once we have them, replace the PNGs and update this report. Source archive: docs/SC5/Vectorize.png and docs/SC5/Monochrome _G_ on black backdrop.png.
A snapshot of GPortal as of 2026-05-06. Currently inheriting WallSpace cyan/pink. The full spec lives at gportal-spec.
The directory + planner + match engine all work. The cyan-and-pink chrome on top of them is borrowed clothing.
What stays vs. shifts: the eyebrow rhythm, mono metadata, border-color hover, and wordmark structure all translate cleanly to monochrome. The per-directory accent coding does not — that's the part of the migration that needs collective input. See §07.
A short ruleset so logos don't drift, get recolored, or fork into unauthorized variants.
assets/web-portal/media/ (served at https://gooism.org/media/). All web embeds reference these. SVGs to be added once vector files are ready.gooism-wordmark-neon.{ext} for the GOOISM wordmark, gooism-g-mark.{ext} for the standalone G. Future variants suffix-based (e.g. gooism-wordmark-neon-1080.png for social).#000000. Both marks were designed against true black, not a charcoal stand-in. Charcoal kills the neon glow.docs/brand/gooism/source/ (to be created). Until vector source is delivered, the high-res PNGs are the masters.v0.1 laid out three options. v0.2 records the proposal Jack is putting forward and that the prototype demonstrates. Option C — Mono + Functional Color is what's been built — pending collective review.
#58e1ff as the single action accent, used for: input focus, link hovers, success feedback, focus rings, separators. Primary CTAs remain white-on-black for highest contrast (cyan is "this is interactive," white is "this is the thing to click"). Same cyan as WallSpace = brand-family continuity. This is what's being prototyped for review — the collective hasn't signed off yet.
Proposed migration timing (if the collective agrees): GPortal palette migration tracks GPortal's own version cadence. When we cut v0.5 (interactive Signal Planner save/load + curated portal scaffolding), the palette would shift from current cyan/pink/purple/orange to mono + cyan. Until then GPortal stays in inherited WallSpace clothes — new work shouldn't double-pay design cost, and members already onboarded shouldn't get whiplash.
These are the genuinely-open questions. Reply on the brand-report comment thread or in the next collective sync.
The neon-grid wordmark is the wordmark. What's the body typeface? Three candidates: keep the current system stack (-apple-system, Inter), commit to a distinctive sans (Söhne, GT America, Suisse), or go more characterful (a sans with personality like FK Grotesk Neue or Trim Mono). Each implies a different shelf placement.
Mono + functional color. See §06. Already prototyped on gooism.org for the collective to react to. Not yet collectively locked — this is what Jack thinks we should do; bring concerns or alternatives to the next sync. If agreed, GPortal palette migration would land at the v0.5 cut.
Founder marks? "Gooism Recommended" stamp for curated VJs? Member badges? Per-stage marks (e.g. main stage / festival)? The G + wordmark is the system core — but operational use will spawn variants. Better to design those once than discover them ad-hoc.
The wordmark's neon-grid lends itself to subtle animation (slow grid drift, pulsing line glow, perspective camera move). Do we commit to a motion vocabulary now, or stay still and let the first motion piece (gooism.org hero) define it?
The visual brand reads spare, confident, technical-poetic. Does our copy match that today? Should we audit existing GPortal microcopy and bring it into voice, or keep that for a later pass?
The current logo masters are PNG. We need SVG / AI source for true scalability and future variants (animated SVG, alternate widths, motion stems). Who owns delivering that — the original designer, or a new pass?
docs/brand/gooism/source/ for the masters once we have them.